In class, we talked about how many of us have simply
memorized the information the day before the exam, take the exam, and then
forget it immediately after. I have done this so many times. If you asked me to
recall the information from memory a week after a test, I probably could only
tell you about half of it. If you had me take the test again without looking at
the information and cramming beforehand, I would probably fail it. Students
like me do not understand the knowledge on a deeper level, and only know it for
the test, but would not be able to explain it on a deeper level. We are not
masters of this knowledge. Do not own this knowledge, we rent it for the time
we need it and then move it out of our minds.
To fix this, we need to interact with the knowledge more, pick it apart,
use it in different ways, and apply it to our lives. This working definition of
mastery from the chapter presents this well: “Students have mastered content
when they demonstrate a thorough understanding as evidenced by doing something
substantive with the content beyond merely echoing it. Anyone can repeat
information; it’s the masterful student that can break content into its
component pieces, explain it and alternative perspectives regarding it cogently
to others, and use it purposefully in new situations.” This is why alternating
teaching styles is so important. Only when students interact with the
information do they really start to know it and understand it for the long
term, not just know it for the test on Friday.
No comments:
Post a Comment